Assurance Cases for Proofs as Evidence

Proof-carrying code (PCC) provides a “gold standard” for establishing formal and objective confidence in program behavior. However, in order to extend the benefits of PCC – and other formal certification techniques – to realistic systems, we must establish the correspondence of a mathematical proof of a program’s semantics and its actual behavior. In this paper, we argue that assurance cases are an effective means of establishing such a correspondence. To this end, we present an assurance case pattern for arguing that a proof is free from various proof hazards. We also instantiate this pattern for a proof-based mechanism to provide evidence about a generic medical device software.